Changes for page 17A-04 Radiation Signature
Last modified by Barry Bishop on 2017/02/26 13:59
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -4,23 +4,20 @@ 4 4 |Suit|Aouda.X 5 5 |Date|04. Jan. 2017 6 6 7 -In today’s RF environment it is imperative that modern day devices and especially space suits are 8 -meeting the EMC (electromagnetic compatibility) Standards. It basically states that products must 9 -not emit unwanted electromagnetic pollution (interference) and, because there is a certain amount 10 -of electromagnetic pollution in the environment, that products must be immune to a reasonable 11 -amount of interference. The Directive itself gives no figures or guidelines on what the required level 12 -of emissions or immunity are, nor does it state the frequency band limits. This interpretation of the 13 -Directive’s requirements is left to the standards that are used to demonstrate compliance with de 14 -Directive. For the Aouda Suit it is not entirely clear which EN Standards apply and further research 15 -has to be done. 7 +In today’s RF environment it is imperative that modern day devices and especially space suits are meeting the EMC (electromagnetic compatibility) Standards. It basically states that products must not emit unwanted electromagnetic pollution (interference) and, because there is a certain amount 8 +of electromagnetic pollution in the environment, that products must be immune to a reasonable amount of interference. The Directive itself gives no figures or guidelines on what the required level of emissions or immunity are, nor does it state the frequency band limits. This interpretation of the Directive’s requirements is left to the standards that are used to demonstrate compliance with de 9 +Directive. For the Aouda Suit it is not entirely clear which EN Standards apply and further research has to be done. 16 16 17 -**Subtest 1: **Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test; reaction of device under 18 -test should be: a normal performance within the specification limits. 11 +**Subtest 1: **Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test; reaction of device under test should be: a normal performance within the specification limits. 19 19 20 -**Subtest 2: **Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test; reaction of device under test should be: a normal 21 -performance within the specification limits. 13 +**Subtest 2: **Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test; reaction of device under test should be: a normal performance within the specification limits. 22 22 23 23 **Subtest 3: **Human exposure to radio frequency fields 24 24 17 +=== Experiment Data === 18 + 25 25 |=Directories/files|=Description 26 -|[[04-Jan-2017>>url:https://mission.oewf.org/archive_downloads/aoudatest17a/04-RadiationSignature/2017-01-04/]]|Result data\\Matlab code 20 +|[[Test report>>url:https://mission.oewf.org/archive_downloads/aoudatest17a/04-RadiationSignature/2017-01-04/]]|Test report 21 +|[[Result data>>url:https://mission.oewf.org/archive_downloads/aoudatest17a/04-RadiationSignature/2017-01-04/Ergebnisse/]]|Result data 22 +|[[Matlab>>url:https://mission.oewf.org/archive_downloads/aoudatest17a/04-RadiationSignature/2017-01-04/Matlab/]]|Matlab source code 23 +