<
From version < 2.1 >
edited by Barry Bishop
on 2017/02/03 18:23
To version < 2.2 >
edited by Barry Bishop
on 2017/02/05 14:51
>
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -4,23 +4,20 @@
4 4  |Suit|Aouda.X
5 5  |Date|04. Jan. 2017
6 6  
7 -In today’s RF environment it is imperative that modern day devices and especially space suits are
8 -meeting the EMC (electromagnetic compatibility) Standards. It basically states that products must
9 -not emit unwanted electromagnetic pollution (interference) and, because there is a certain amount
10 -of electromagnetic pollution in the environment, that products must be immune to a reasonable
11 -amount of interference. The Directive itself gives no figures or guidelines on what the required level
12 -of emissions or immunity are, nor does it state the frequency band limits. This interpretation of the
13 -Directive’s requirements is left to the standards that are used to demonstrate compliance with de
14 -Directive. For the Aouda Suit it is not entirely clear which EN Standards apply and further research
15 -has to be done.
7 +In today’s RF environment it is imperative that modern day devices and especially space suits are meeting the EMC (electromagnetic compatibility) Standards. It basically states that products must not emit unwanted electromagnetic pollution (interference) and, because there is a certain amount
8 +of electromagnetic pollution in the environment, that products must be immune to a reasonable amount of interference. The Directive itself gives no figures or guidelines on what the required level of emissions or immunity are, nor does it state the frequency band limits. This interpretation of the Directive’s requirements is left to the standards that are used to demonstrate compliance with de
9 +Directive. For the Aouda Suit it is not entirely clear which EN Standards apply and further research has to be done.
16 16  
17 -**Subtest 1: **Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test; reaction of device under
18 -test should be: a normal performance within the specification limits.
11 +**Subtest 1: **Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test; reaction of device under test should be: a normal performance within the specification limits.
19 19  
20 -**Subtest 2: **Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test; reaction of device under test should be: a normal
21 -performance within the specification limits.
13 +**Subtest 2: **Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test; reaction of device under test should be: a normal performance within the specification limits.
22 22  
23 23  **Subtest 3: **Human exposure to radio frequency fields
24 24  
17 +=== Experiment Data ===
18 +
25 25  |=Directories/files|=Description
26 -|[[04-Jan-2017>>url:https://mission.oewf.org/archive_downloads/aoudatest17a/04-RadiationSignature/2017-01-04/]]|Result data\\Matlab code
20 +|[[Test report>>url:https://mission.oewf.org/archive_downloads/aoudatest17a/04-RadiationSignature/2017-01-04/]]|Test report
21 +|[[Result data>>url:https://mission.oewf.org/archive_downloads/aoudatest17a/04-RadiationSignature/2017-01-04/Ergebnisse/]]|Result data
22 +|[[Matlab>>url:https://mission.oewf.org/archive_downloads/aoudatest17a/04-RadiationSignature/2017-01-04/Matlab/]]|Matlab source code
23 +
Copyright 2018 - Österreichisches Weltraum Forum. All rights reserved.