Changes for page 17A-04 Radiation Signature

Last modified by Barry Bishop on 2017/02/26 13:59

From version < 5.1 >

edited by Barry Bishop
on 2017/02/26 13:58

To version 1.1 >

edited by Barry Bishop
on 2017/01/07 12:08

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Attachments (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
- suit_radiation_240.jpg

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -4,29 +4,20 @@
  |Suit|Aouda.X
  |Date|04. Jan. 2017
--(% class="image" style="float:right" %)
--(((
--[[image:suit_radiation_240.jpg]]
++In today’s RF environment it is imperative that modern day devices and especially space suits are
++meeting the EMC (electromagnetic compatibility) Standards. It basically states that products must
++not emit unwanted electromagnetic pollution (interference) and, because there is a certain amount
++of electromagnetic pollution in the environment, that products must be immune to a reasonable
++amount of interference. The Directive itself gives no figures or guidelines on what the required level
++of emissions or immunity are, nor does it state the frequency band limits. This interpretation of the
++Directive’s requirements is left to the standards that are used to demonstrate compliance with de
++Directive. For the Aouda Suit it is not entirely clear which EN Standards apply and further research
++has to be done.
--(((
--Aouda.X helmet and head-up display (HUD)
--)))
--)))
++**Subtest 1: **Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test; reaction of device under
++test should be: a normal performance within the specification limits.
--In today’s RF environment it is imperative that modern day devices and especially space suits are meeting the EMC (electromagnetic compatibility) Standards. It basically states that products must not emit unwanted electromagnetic pollution (interference) and, because there is a certain amount
--of electromagnetic pollution in the environment, that products must be immune to a reasonable amount of interference. The Directive itself gives no figures or guidelines on what the required level of emissions or immunity are, nor does it state the frequency band limits. This interpretation of the Directive’s requirements is left to the standards that are used to demonstrate compliance with de
--Directive. For the Aouda Suit it is not entirely clear which EN Standards apply and further research has to be done.
++**Subtest 2: **Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test; reaction of device under test should be: a normal
++performance within the specification limits.
--**Subtest 1: **Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test; reaction of device under test should be: a normal performance within the specification limits.
--
--**Subtest 2: **Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test; reaction of device under test should be: a normal performance within the specification limits.
--
  **Subtest 3: **Human exposure to radio frequency fields
--
--=== Experiment Data ===
--
--|=Directories/files|=Description
--|[[Test report>>url:https://mission.oewf.org/archive_downloads/aoudatest17a/04-RadiationSignature/2017-01-04/]]|Test report
--|[[Result data>>url:https://mission.oewf.org/archive_downloads/aoudatest17a/04-RadiationSignature/2017-01-04/Ergebnisse/]]|Result data
--|[[Matlab>>url:https://mission.oewf.org/archive_downloads/aoudatest17a/04-RadiationSignature/2017-01-04/Matlab/]]|Matlab source code
--

suit_radiation_240.jpg

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-XWiki.bbishop

Size

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-61.6 KB

Content